How to file a complaint against an assisted living in the DC metro, and why DC Health, Maryland's OHCQ, and Virginia's VDSS each require a different call.
By DC Senior Advisor Care Team · September 11, 2026
Families almost always start in the wrong place. When something goes wrong in an assisted living, the instinct is to escalate inside the building - the aide, then the wellness director, then the executive director, then whoever owns the company. That is worth doing, and it resolves a great many problems. But it is not a complaint in the regulatory sense, and it creates no record anywhere outside the building. Learning how to file a complaint against an assisted living means learning which government office holds that particular building's license, because in the Washington DC metro there are three of them and they do not share intake, do not share files, and do not forward complaints to each other. A voicemail left with the wrong agency is not a slow complaint. It is no complaint.
The dividing line is the address, not the brand. A regional operator can run a community in Chevy Chase DC and another in Chevy Chase, Maryland, a mile apart, under the same logo and the same regional vice president, and those two buildings answer to entirely different regulators under entirely different regulations. In the District, assisted living residences are licensed by DC Health through the Health Regulation and Licensing Administration, under the Assisted Living Residence Regulatory Act of 2000 (D.C. Code § 44-101.01 et seq.). In Montgomery and Prince George's counties, assisted living programs are licensed by the Maryland Department of Health's Office of Health Care Quality, under COMAR 10.07.14. In Arlington, Alexandria, and Fairfax, assisted living facilities are licensed by the Virginia Department of Social Services under 22VAC40-73. Before you write a single sentence, confirm which of those three applies.
For a residence inside District lines - Capitol Hill, Petworth, Cleveland Park, Brookland, anywhere the mailing address says Washington, DC - the licensing complaint goes to DC Health's Health Regulation and Licensing Administration. HRLA is the office that issued the license, conducts the inspections, and has the authority to cite a deficiency, require a plan of correction, and in serious cases restrict admissions or move to revoke. That is the leverage. A complaint filed there becomes part of the building's regulatory file and, unlike an email to the executive director, survives the departure of whichever staff member you were dealing with.
Running alongside that, and worth using at the same time rather than instead, is the District's Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, housed within the DC Department of Aging and Community Living. DACL's main line is (202) 724-5626. The ombudsman is not a regulator and cannot cite anyone, which is precisely why it is useful: an ombudsman advocates for the resident, can come into the building, can sit in on a care plan meeting, and can often resolve a dispute about a discharge notice or a room change in days rather than the weeks a licensing investigation takes. If you believe your parent is being abused, neglected, or financially exploited right now, neither of those is the first call. That call is DC Adult Protective Services at (202) 541-3950, and if someone is in immediate danger, 911 first.
In Bethesda, Silver Spring, Rockville, Wheaton, Gaithersburg, Hyattsville, College Park, and the rest of Montgomery and Prince George's counties, the licensing complaint belongs to the Office of Health Care Quality within the Maryland Department of Health. OHCQ licenses assisted living programs at Levels 1, 2, and 3, which describe how much care a building is permitted to deliver, and a surprising share of Maryland complaints turn out to be level problems rather than staff problems. A resident whose needs have grown past what a Level 2 program is licensed to provide will generate a steady drip of small failures - missed medications, a fall nobody documented, a shower that keeps getting skipped - that look like neglect and are actually a building operating above its license. Say so in the complaint if you suspect it. OHCQ can check the licensed level against the resident's own assessment in a way a family cannot.
Maryland's ombudsman programs sit at the county level, not the state level, which trips up families who call Baltimore first. In Montgomery County, that is the ombudsman program within Aging and Disability Services, reachable at 240-777-3000. In Prince George's County, it is the Aging and Disabilities Services Division. The statewide front door, Maryland Access Point at 1-844-MAP-LINK, will route you to the right county if you are not sure. Suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation in Maryland goes to Adult Protective Services through the local county Department of Social Services, which is a separate call from both OHCQ and the ombudsman, and should be made even if you have already filed with the other two.
Virginia splits the work three ways, and the split is the single most common reason a Northern Virginia complaint lands somewhere it will sit unread. Assisted living facilities in Arlington, Alexandria, Fairfax, McLean, Reston, Falls Church, Vienna, and Springfield are licensed by the Virginia Department of Social Services under 22VAC40-73, and VDSS licensing inspectors are who you want if the issue is staffing, medication administration, resident rights, a disputed discharge, or the physical condition of the building. Nursing homes are a different regulator entirely: those are licensed by the Virginia Department of Health, which also handles the federal survey work for Medicare and Medicaid-certified beds. If the building calls itself a rehab or a skilled nursing center, you are in VDH territory, not VDSS.
Adult Protective Services in Virginia is administered by the Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services, not by VDSS, and the statewide hotline is 1-888-832-3858, staffed around the clock. This distinction matters because families reasonably assume the agency that licenses the building also takes the abuse report, and in Virginia it does not. Local ombudsman support comes through the area agencies on aging: the Arlington Area Agency on Aging, the Alexandria Division of Aging and Adult Services, or the Fairfax Area Agency on Aging depending on where the building sits. For an Auxiliary Grant resident, loop the local department of social services in as well, since a discharge dispute in an Auxiliary Grant bed has a payment dimension the licensing complaint will not address on its own.
Investigators across all three jurisdictions are working from paper, not from your sense that something is wrong. The complaints that produce findings are specific and dated. Give the resident's full name and room number, the exact name and street address of the facility, and then a chronology: on this date, this happened, this staff member was involved, I reported it to this person, here is what they said. Three dated incidents beat ten pages of general frustration. If you have photographs of a wound or a room, keep them. If you have text messages from the community, keep those too. Note whether the resident has a cognitive impairment, because that changes how an investigator weighs the resident's own account and what they are required to look at.
Two things are worth including that families routinely leave out. First, what you want to happen. An investigator reading "my mother is dehydrated and nobody is tracking her intake" can look for a fluid record; an investigator reading "this place is terrible" cannot. Second, whether the problem is ongoing. A complaint describing a condition still happening today is triaged very differently from one describing something that resolved in June. You can file anonymously in all three jurisdictions, and some families do. Understand the trade: an anonymous complaint means the investigator cannot call you back for the detail that makes the case, and cannot tell you what came of it.
Expect silence, and do not read it as inaction. Licensing investigations are not customer service; the agency's duty runs to the regulatory record, and in most cases it will not narrate its progress to you. What it does produce is an inspection outcome, and those outcomes are public. Ask the agency for the survey or inspection report covering the period of your complaint, and ask the facility directly as well, since licensed communities are generally required to make recent inspection results available to residents and families on request. If a deficiency was cited, there will be a plan of correction attached, and that document is the most useful thing you will get out of the process, because it commits the building in writing to a specific fix on a specific timeline.
If the response is genuinely inadequate, escalate laterally rather than repeating yourself. Bring in the ombudsman if you only filed with the licensing agency, or file with the licensing agency if you only called the ombudsman - they are different instruments and they work well together. For a Medicaid-funded resident, the Medicaid agency in that jurisdiction has its own interest in the outcome: DC Medicaid through the Department of Health Care Finance, Maryland Medical Assistance, or Virginia Medicaid through DMAS. Elected officials have constituent services staff who can ask an agency for a status update, and in the DC metro that is a real lever. And keep filing. A single complaint is an allegation; a pattern across several families is what moves a regulator from a paper review to an unannounced visit.
Free, no pressure, and no one rushing you. We answer to families, not to facilities.
Or call (571) 497-4418